Vectors vs. Bitmaps for Printing
When it comes to sending files to a commercial printer, there are two types of files you need to know about: vectors and bitmaps. We’ll see what the strengths and weaknesses of each are, and when to use them in print design. We’ll also look at some visual examples of vector and bitmap artwork.
The Difference between Vectors and Bitmaps
First off, we’ll have a quick look at what exactly a vector file and a bitmap file are.
Vector
A vector file is a file that’s constructed from shapes that are defined by mathematical equations. As a result, when you zoom into a vector image, the quality remains sharp, like the image below scaled to 400%.
Vector image at 400% (on screen)
The fact that vectors are constructed using mathematical equations is their strength. It keeps the details in the image as high as possible, and means that if you want to change how large or how small you would like the image to be printed, you can do so without worrying about quality.
Bitmap
A bitmap file (also known as a raster) is an image that’s constructed from pixels. If you zoom into a bitmap file (like the image below scaled to 400%) you start to see the individual pixels and, consequently, it’s important that bitmap files for of printing are used with a resolution that is high enough — typically, 300 dpi or more.
Bitmap image at 400% (on screen)
The strength of using a bitmap file format lies in the tools you can use to create and edit them (like Photoshop). There are certain techniques that you simply can’t do (or can’t do as well) within a vector graphics editor like Illustrator. This gives you greater flexibility when creating or modifying artwork.
Another strength of bitmaps is linked with their use in photography. Photos are created as bitmaps within a typical digital camera, normally as JPGs or RAW files. So if you’re working with photographic-quality images, you’ll typically need to use a bitmap file.
Vector File Format Examples
| Name | File Extension |
| EPS (Encapsulated PostScript) | .eps |
| AI (Adobe Illustrator Artwork) | .ai |
| CDR (CorelDRAW) | .cdr |
| SVG (Scalable Vector Graphics) | .svg |
| PDF (Portable Document Format) |
Note: By the way, PDF and EPS are technically compound file formats, meaning that they can handle both vector and bitmap artwork. However, for simplicity’s sake, they’re more commonly known and categorized as vector file formats.
Bitmap File Format Examples
| Name | File Extension |
| TIFF (Tagged Image File Format) | .tif, .tiff |
| JPEG | .jpg, .jpeg |
| PSD (Photoshop Document) | .psd |
| GIF (Graphics Interchange Format) | .gif |
| PNG (Portable Network Graphics) | .png |
Visual Comparisons of Vector vs. Bitmap
300 dpi is generally considered the minimum resolution for printing bitmap work, like photos or complex artwork.
There can be a marked difference between the way bitmaps and vectors are printed.
Below are some close-up images from a chapter on file types in The Print Handbook. The book was printed using a Heidelberg Speedmaster XL75 litho printer. Each image’s actual width is roughly 15 mm (just over half an inch).
EPS and PDF (PDF/X 1a:2001)
Here are two examples of an EPS image and a PDF image.
EPS example
PDF example
You can see that there’s no noticeable difference between an EPS and PDF. They both produce sharp results.
TIFF (300 dpi)
Here is an example of a TIF image.
TIFF example
This is where things start to get interesting.
Even at 300 dpi, a TIF cannot produce the same quality as a vector file. Through the process of converting the original Illustrator file to a TIF, the smoothness of the lines is lost. It’s possible to see the individual dots of the print screen, which disrupt the crisp edges of the lines.
It’s worth noting that, though the images here are close-up images, the difference is still noticeable to the naked eye.
JPEG (300 dpi/Quality: High)
Here is an example of a JPEG image.
JPEG example.
The JPEG image above (with its quality set to High) struggles like the TIFF. The lines seem rough and the dots of the print screen are again visible.
Another issue with the JPG image is the white in the original image is no longer white. The spaces between lines have been filled with a compression noise that the TIF does not have.
One last problem that occurred with the JPG was its inability to reproduce spot colors. The red lines in each of the previous examples are printed using Pantone 185. However, JPGs can;t work with spot colors so this was converted to a CMYK value instead, which produces a color that is a little yellower.
Summary
After comparing various vector and bitmap images, I think we’ve learned a few things.
- Vector files like PDFs and EPSs produce the sharpest printed results, even when compared to a 300 dpi TIFF.
- One thing to bear in mind in all this is that the lines within the artwork are made up of solid colors (e.g. 100% cyan). This means that no print screen dots can be seen on the vector example photos. However, if the lines were tints (e.g. 50% cyan) then dots would be seen on both the vector and bitmap artwork to create the illusion to the naked eye of a lighter color. As a result, the difference in print quality between the two types of file is likely to still be there, but less obvious.
- If you’re using spot colors in your artwork, then avoid JPGs. They can’t handle spot colors and will simply convert any spot colors to CMYK or RGB.
- If you’re creating a bitmap file, then save the file as a TIFF or PSD to keep the full amount of detail. We’ve seen above that even a JPEG saved at High quality still loses detail.
- Ultimately, there are certain situations (like working with photographic-quality images) where bitmaps are your first choice; but if you can, use vector files whenever possible.

9 Comments (Add yours)
gez
Jan 08 2012
You’re missing an important fact: The RIP (which by the way means ‘raster image processor’) converts those vectors to high resolution bitmaps. So you’ll be printing bitmaps anyway.
The difference is that bitmaps @300dpi are (likely) kept at that resolution while vectors are rasterized using much more resolution and no antialiasing.
The dithered edges in your samples are caused by antialiasing, not low resolution.
I’d say the worst problem of working with 300dpi tiff files with vector shapes or text is that. The AA pixels aren’t solid colors, so they’re dithered by the RIP (just as any 50% black shade, for instance). So, avoid antialiasing and you get sharp edges.
What happens if you print a 1200 dpi tiff image (without antialiasing) created from the same vector shapes? You get something that looks pretty close (if not exactly) to the prints produced from vectors.
Even 600 dpi without antialiasing will look pretty similar if paper has a moderate dot gain.
Russell Spears
Jan 12 2012
But 1200ppi Tiffs are large files at any reasonable size. I do not believe JPEGs are as bad as shown when compared with tiffs if the least amount of compression is applied. As far a vector, if your careful with the color build, you can get great line work. Anyone else want to weigh in on Jpeg files VS Tiff Files?
Di
Jan 13 2012
Do not say to work and print vector is always easier and more efficient, add at least 600 DPI, but will be a little confusing – if card =). For the article thanks!
strony
Jan 15 2012
Very nice comparision.
Russell Spears
Jan 16 2012
You should show what comes out of a RIP system that is raster type at 300 and 1200. and compare it to what comes out from vector. Then you will see the difference.
Jeff Kee
May 24 2012
This is a very well written article. It’s incredible how many want-to-be graphic designers at their young careers do not understand this whatsoever at a deep level. This is graphic design 101. I’m 26, with young eyes – I can tell without a microscope when letters/shapes are printed from a bitmap rather than vector. I can see the edges, and the perceptive quality diminishes very quickly if that is the case.
SANJEEV
Oct 24 2012
CAN YOU THINK OF FOUR COLOUR PROCESS IMAGE WITH CONTINOUS TONAL VALUE BEING PRINTED WITHOUT ANY PIXEL DOTS.
Robert Smith
Jan 02 2013
This article is so interesting and informative.
Robert Smith
Jan 02 2013
Excellent comparison….between Vector vs. Bitmap.